Legal Opinion
Botchlett v. City of Bethany
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 22, 1966No. 41440PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
Plaintiff in error as plaintiff in each of two separate actions in the trial court filed his petition wherein he alleged that the City of Bethany and its co-defendants were interfering with his lawful use of his real property by continuous and harassing arrests for alleged violations of a city zoning ordinance; that the said ordinance is constitutionally invalid insofar as it attempts to restrict plaintiff’s use of his property in conformity with the zoning of the area for single family residential use only; that plaintiff’s use of his property for a contractor’s storage…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- City of Tucson v. Arizona MortuaryArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Beveridge v. Harper & Turner Oil TrustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Arsenault v. KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
- Gross v. AllanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- O'ROURKE v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Mid-Continent Life Insurance Co. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Garrett v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Kinslow Round-Up Inc. v. City of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- In Re De-Annexation of Certain Real PropertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.