Legal Opinion
City of Hartshorne v. Marathon Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 3, 1979No. 50105PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice:
The City of Hartshorne (City) enacted ordinance 412 dated October 5, 1970. Section 2(a) of this ordinance provides:
“2. Permits for drilling, maintaining and operating oil and gas wells in the City of Hartshorne shall be granted only after the following conditions have been met and performed:(a) That payment of $100.00 shall be made to the City Clerk for the issuance of such permit and to cover cost and expense of inspecting the location and operation during the drilling phase of said well, and to cover the annual fee for the first year of operation and production if said well…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Keaton v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Gruger v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Clouser v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Kershaw County v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- TOCH, LLC v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Fleck v. FleckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Red Slipper Club, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- TOCH, LLC v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Great Plains Resources, Inc. v. City of BentonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.