Legal Opinion

Pacific Palisades Ass'n v. City of Huntington Beach

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 7636PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

Plaintiff brought an action seeking to enjoin the City of Huntington Beach and its city marshal from attempting to enforce the provisions of an ordinance prohibiting plaintiff from erecting derricks, installing machinery, and drilling oil wells on its own lands within the city limits. The trial court sustained the general demurrer to the complaint, interposed by the defendants, and plaintiff declined to amend. Judgment was entered for the defendants, from which judgment plaintiff appeals.

The appellant is the owner of thirteen acres of land located within the boundaries of that portion of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Ex Parte HadacheckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Anderson v. JesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API