Legal Opinion

Marblehead Land Co. v. City of Los Angeles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1931No. 6104PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Appellants filed a bill in equity to enjoin the appellee from enforcing a zoning ordinance by the terms of which the oil well drilling operations of the appellants were declared illegal in the zone wherein the land owned by the appellant Marblehead Land Company is located. This land is leased by the appellant Standard Oil Company of California under a lease which provides for the sinking of oil •wells upon said property, and, if oil is found thereon, provides for the production of oil therefrom.

Appellants concede that, since the decision of the Supreme Court in Euclid v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API