White's Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Kephabt,
The City of Pittsburgh, pursuant to a statutory authority, passed a zoning ordinance. It provided a comprehensive plan to divide the city into districts and regulate the use of the land and buildings thereon. Briefly, the ordinance divided the city into five use districts, a heavy industrial, a light industrial and a commercial district, an “A” residence district, and a “¡B” residence district, and specified from eight to thirty-five prohibited uses for each district. Many restrictions are imposed on the use and occupancy.
In the division relating to residence…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by230 opinions
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.