Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1933No. 23977PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an original action in mandamus in this court, in which the relator seeks to compel the Industrial Commission to pay him compensation for permanent total disability.

The relator was seriously injured in a mine explosion in September, 1917, and upon filing his claim with the Industrial Commission received compensation for partial disability. The commission has paid the relator compensation for total loss of the right eye and for a seventy per cent. loss of the left hand, and on February 26, 1932, relator made application for further compensation. On March 29, 1932, the Industrial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Industrial Commission v. HogleOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. KriseOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State ex rel. Hutton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API