State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The primary issue in this case is whether the Industrial Commission had before it some evidence upon which to decide that the relator-claimant was not permanently and totally disabled. We do not pronounce new law in this opinion, but reiterate established law, so as to hopefully clarify the current law of Ohio relative to the jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission to review the claimant’s file, and to determine whether there exists sufficient evidence to conclude the ultimate issue. It is basic law, without need of citation, that the Industrial Commission has considerable discretion in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. KriseOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by274 opinions
- State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
269 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.