Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1994No. 93-5PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

This case presents two important workers’ compensation issues. The first issue is whether a self-insured employer who, subsequent *205to the initial allowance of a claim, certifies a medical condition as allowed on a C-174 form has conclusively granted that additional condition as part of the claim. The second issue involves the effect of post-PTD retirement upon a claimant’s eligibility for PTD compensation.

I

Allowance of Additional Condition by Self-Insured Employer

In Ohio, employers are required to make semiannual premium payments to the State Insurance Fund for the purpose of establishing…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State Ex Rel. Black v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2013

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API