Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1972No. 71-476PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Per curiam

This court has held on many occasions that the determination of disputed factual situations is within the final jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission, and subject to correction by action in mandamus only upon a showing of abuse of discretion. Slatmeyer v. Indus. Comm. (1926), 115 Ohio St. 654; State, ex rel. Coen, v. Indus. Comm. (1933), 126 Ohio St. 550; State, ex rel. Moore, v. Indus. Comm. (1935), 129 Ohio St. 195; State, ex rel. Berry, v. Indus. Comm. (1935), 129 Ohio St. 228; State, ex rel. Wilms, v. Blake (1945), 144 Ohio St. 619; State, ex rel. Howard Eng. & Mfg. Co., v. Indus.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Slatmeyer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Wilms v. BlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. Ohio Stove Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State ex rel. Reed v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API