Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1987No. 86-230PublishedCited by 328 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause is but another example of the multitude of cases in which this court has been asked to evaluate the credibility of the evidence before the Industrial Commission in workers’ compensation claims involving two or more allowed conditions. All of these actions are the result of this court’s judgment in State, ex rel. Anderson, v. Indus. Comm. (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 166, 16 O.O. 3d 199, 404 N.E. 2d 153, wherein this court established the combined-effects evidentiary rule.

The impetus for this decision was a concern that in the disposition of multiple-injury claims, the commission would…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Rouch v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Anderson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by328 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Pass v. C.S.T. Extraction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Eberhardt v. Flxible Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1988

323 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API