Willits Water Etc. Co. v. Landrum
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The appeal is by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant decreeing that he was entitled to divert and devote to beneficial use the natural flow of a stream of water known as "Southard" Creek, in Mendocino County, to the extent of two and one-half miner's inches measured under a four-inch pressure, and also that he was the owner of a certain flume and ditch and a right of way across plaintiff's land for a diverting system for the appropriation of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Burr v. MacLay Rancho Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Gurnsey v. Antelope Creek & Red Bluff Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
- Riverside Water Co. v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ward v. City of MonroviaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Village of Fairview v. Franklin Maple Creek Pioneer Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938
- County of Tuolumne v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- De La Cuesta v. BazziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941