Riverside Water Co. v. Sargent
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order denying a new trial. John L. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
This action concerns the relative rights of the plaintiff, a corporation, and the defendant, Timber Ditch Water Company, also a corporation, to the use (acquired by appropriation) of water flowing in the Santa Ana river in San Bernardino county; each share of the stock of said Timber Ditch Company represents the right of the holder thereof to use for a definite time all the water owned or controlled by the company, and the interest of the other defendants arises from their ownership of shares of such stock, and consequent right to an apportionment of the water. It is alleged in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Barrows v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Lillis v. Emigrant Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Stewart v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Shenandoah Mining & Milling Co. v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of San Bernardino v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Watson v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Walsh v. WallaceNevada Supreme Court · 1902
- Ward v. City of MonroviaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation District v. Wutchumna Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.