Legal Opinion
County of Tuolumne v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 1, 1962No. Civ. 70PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, by a qualified engineer, particularly where the manner of evaluation had been superseded by a review and equalization decision by the State Board of Equalization.
The County of Tuolumne, pursuant to article XIII, section 1, of the California Constitution, assessed appropriative water rights located in that county but owned by the City and County of San Francisco. The assessment was reviewed, equalized and adjusted by the State Board of Equalization. Tuolumne County, dissatisfied with the decision, sought a writ of mandate in the superior court of that county, pursuant to section 1094.5,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- City of San Bernardino v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Forster Shipbuilding Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- BRET HARTE INN, INC v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- County of Amador v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- California Portland Cement Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Scott-Free River Expeditions, Inc. v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.