Legal Opinion
De La Cuesta v. Bazzi
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 1941No. Civ. 2793PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
The evidence produced, as reflected by the transcript, consumes over 1300 pages. Voluminous briefs have been filed setting forth the points and authorities and arguments of respective counsel. The essential facts in the case may be thus summarized:
Respondent owns the westerly portion of lot 9 of the subdivision of Rancho de la Vega, situated in Santa Barbara County. The entire lot 9 contains 748.35 acres. The portion owned by respondent contains 234.25 acres. Appellants own a tract of land lying immediately west of and adjoining respondent’s land, which tract is known as Lot 7B of the Rancho…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Chichester v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Burris v. People's Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Southern California Investment Co. v. WilshireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Crimmins v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Ampuero v. LuceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Bradley v. Frazier Park Playgrounds, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Thorstrom v. ThorstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.