Burr v. MacLay Rancho Water Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court and in the opinion reported in 154 Cal. 428.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
From the judgment in this action the plaintiff appealed on the judgment-roll alone and his appeal resulted in á modification of the judgment of the court below by this court. The report of the case is to be found in 154 Cal. 428, [98 Pac. 260].
The appeal now before us is that of the defendant and the interveners from the judgment and is presented on the judgment-roll, together with a bill of exceptions. The nature of the case and many of the facts appear in the opinion filed in the matter of the plaintiff’s appeal and we shall not, therefore, undertake to make a new statement of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Gilmer v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- Palermo L. W. Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.