Legal Opinion

Ward v. City of Monrovia

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1940No. L. A. 16494PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff brought an action against the City of Monrovia and others to quiet title to waters which he alleged were riparian to his lands but which were wrongfully diverted by the defendants within five years prior to the filing of the complaint. By a separate action against the same defendants the plaintiff sought to quiet title to a one-fourth interest or share in waters flowing or developed in a certain tract of land belonging to the City of Monrovia, and which adjoins the plaintiff's land. The defendants, City of Monrovia, L. L. Bradbury & Co., and Bradbury Estate Company,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Herzog v. GrossoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Haley v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API