Legal Opinion

Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1911No. Sac. No. 1745PublishedCited by 83 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County and from an order denying a new trial. James P. Ellison, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

Plaintiff is the owner in fee of a large tract of land near Red Bluff in Tehama County, across which for over forty years a public wagon road or highway, commencing at Red Bluff and running to the easterly boundary of the county, has existed.

Defendant is a public service corporation, organized for the purpose of furnishing the public along its lines with electricity for power, heat, and lighting and also furnishing municipalities, cities, and towns with electricity for like purposes, including the lighting of highways, and when this action was brought was engaged in furnishing it for these…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Williams v. McMillanOhio Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Hanlin v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Fresno Etc. Co. v. Southern Pac. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Loma Portal Civic Club v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Chesney v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API