Villa v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
I
In this contract action, plaintiffs, Acacia Villa and 27 other developers of rental housing projects, seek back rent payments for housing units rented to low-income families under Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contracts entered into pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as *278amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f. The relevant background facts are set forth in this court’s prior decision, Acacia Villa v. United States, 24 Cl.Ct. 445 (1991). This action is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment with respect to two of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Julius Goldman's Egg City v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- National Leased Housing Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- National Leased Housing Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- SIPCO Services & Marine Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Statesman II Apartments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Statesman II Apartments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006