Legal Opinion
National Leased Housing Ass'n v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 21, 1994No. Nos. 6-87C, 324-87C, 204-88C and 6-90CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
I
In these consolidated actions, plaintiffs, National Leased Housing Association and *456230 present or former owners of rental housing projects seek back-rent payments from the United States for housing units plaintiffs rented to low-income families pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f (the Housing Act). Each plaintiff entered a Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) contract which, in effect, guaranteed to the project owner an initial specified contract rent for each housing unit rented to a low-income family and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- National Leased Housing Association, and 189 Named v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Hopi Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Garreaux v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.