Legal Opinion

Bone v. Bowen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1919No. Civil No. 1776PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. F. H. Lyman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is a companion case to Bone v. Highway Commission (just decided), ante, p. 587, 185 Pac. 131, and has for its object the restraining of the board of supervisors of Maricopa county and the highway commission of Maricopa county from entering into a plan or scheme they have formulated, whereby the commission proposes to advance to the board the sum of $40,000, to be used by the board to purchase a rock-crushing plant to manufacture rock to be by them turned over to the highway commission at cost, and to be used by the commission in its program of highway construction. More in detail, it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Control v. BucksteggeArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  2. County of Santa Cruz v. BarnesArizona Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kenney v. Bank of MiamiArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Breathitt County v. HammondsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Gannon v. HohusenArizona Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Board of Supervisors v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WainscottArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Buntman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. School Dist. No. 2 v. Jackson-Wilson High School Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API