Buntman v. City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
Philip Bnntman and George O. Ford, hereinafter called plaintiffs, applied to the superior court of Maricopa county for an injunction for bidding the city of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the city, and its commissioners, from holding an election for the purpose of submitting to the taxpaying qualified electors of said city the question of whether or not it should issue $750,000 of its serial bonds for the purpose of the reconstruction and rehabilitation of the street railway system, which was then and is now owned and operated by the city. Plaintiffs, after the formal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. HallettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Schultz v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1916
- Austin v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Butler v. AndrusMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Bone v. BowenArizona Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Allison v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Rochlin v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Phoenix v. Arizona Sash, Door & Glass Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Tucson v. Polar Water Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Tucson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.