Legal Opinion

County of Santa Cruz v. Barnes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1904No. Civil No. 844PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. George R. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.

An action was brought by Barnes & Martin, attorneys, against the county of Santa Cruz to recover for legal services rendered at the request of the board of supervisors of Santa Cruz County before the joint board of supervisors of Santa Cruz and Pima counties in arranging the bonded indebtedness of said county, and in litigation in the district court in regard to the amount of the indebtedness of Pima County for which Santa Cruz County should provide. The case was tried to a jury, and from a judgment for plaintiffs in accordance with the verdict of such jury the county appeals.

There were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hornblower v. DudenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Elias v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Irwin v. County of YubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Smith v. Mayor & Common Council of Sacramento CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Scollay v. County of ButteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McKnight v. HodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Kerby v. State Ex Rel. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Austin v. BarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State ex rel. Lindsey v. DerbyshireWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Bone v. BowenArizona Supreme Court · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API