Legal Opinion

Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1995No. CV-94-0122-PR, CV-94-0501-PRPublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

We accepted jurisdiction of defendant Arizona Department of Revenue’s petition for review of the decision of the court of appeals. The Court of Appeals, Division One, held that a transaction privilege or amusement tax was improperly assessed against Wilderness World, Inc. because guided river trips do not fall within the scope of the tax. We affirm the court of appeals’ opinion and agree that the tax was improperly imposed.

We reverse the court of appeals’ supplemental opinion, which denied attorneys’ fees to Wilderness World, and find that Wilderness World is entitled…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. HassellArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gary Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Sun Lodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ebasco Services Inc. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State Tax Commission v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bade v. DrachmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People's Choice TV Corp. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  3. 4501 NORTHPOINT LP v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Herman v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Haralson v. Fisher Surveying, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2001

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API