Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Bank of Miami

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1918No. Civil No. 1570PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPE'AL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Gila. A. G. McAlister, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This action was instituted by the Bank of Miami to compel the town of Miami and J. D. Kenney to interplead and litigate their respective claims to $1,874.71, held on deposit by the bank. It is shown by the complaint that this fund was placed with the bank by the town as a checking account; that J. D. Kenney, as trustee of the town, claims it “by virtue of an alleged order of the board of supervisors of the county of Gila, state of Arizona, purporting to have appointed said Kenney as trustee of the town”; that the town refuses to recognize the validity of the order of the board of supervisors,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. People Ex Rel. Skelton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. State ex rel. Goodnight v. GoowinTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Faulkner v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Town of South Tucson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hunt v. NortonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hill v. FavourArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Board of Supervisors v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Lewis v. PalmerArizona Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API