Legal Opinion

Gannon v. Hohusen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1913No. Civil No. 1254PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District, in and for the County of Pima. John H. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

This action was commenced by the appellant against the defendants to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by appellant from -the opening of a new road over the homestead claim of appellant. The defendants J. P. Hohusen, C. H. Bayless and C. F. Richardson are alleged to be members of the board of supervisors of Pima .county; and defendant G. L. Smith is alleged to be the county superintendent of roads in said Pima county. It is alleged that the board of supervisors and county superintendent of roads opened up the road, acting under a void order of the board, and opened the road on a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Everett v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bone v. BowenArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Koch v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API