Legal Opinion
Board of Control v. Buckstegge
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1916No. Civil No. 1456PublishedCited by 34 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. Geo. H. Crosby, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
An initiated act adopted at the November, 1914, election undertook to impose the duty upon the board of control of the state of Arizona of ordering the payment of warrants issued by the boards of supervisors of the various, counties of the state in the payment of pensions to certain persons therein mentioned. The act, including the title, reads as follows:
“An act providing for an old age and mothers’ pension and making appropriation therefor.
“Be it enacted by the people of the state of Arizona:
“Section 1. All almshouses within the state shall be abolished, their grounds and buildings shall be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Nevada ex rel. Gilfillan v. EddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Lincoln Street Railway Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- In re HauckMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Ft. Scott v. W. G. Eads Brokerage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Coggins v. ElyArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Black & White Taxicab Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1923
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.