Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Wainscott

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1933No. Civil No. 3240PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

R. T. Wainscott, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, a corporation, Guardian Insurance Agency, Incorporated, a corporation, Phil C. Ensign, Bud Austin and H. C. Gilbert, hereinafter called defendants, under the provisions of sections 790 and 791, Revised Code of 1928, to recover from them certain sums of money paid by the individual defendants, who were at the time of payment the members of the board of supervisors • of Maricopa county, out of the county treasury to the other defendants for premiums on policies of insurance covering the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. AllmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. SharpArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Jones v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. City of Prescott v. SumidArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Avery v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ruth v. RhodesArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Robinson v. LintzArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Taylor v. Roosevelt Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API