Legal Opinion

Matter of Peck

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1994No. JC-93-0001PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

This is a judicial disciplinary proceeding in which we consider the recommendations of the Commission on Judicial Conduct (Commission). We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6.1, §§ 2, 3, and 4 and Rule 11, Rules of Procedure for the Commission on Judicial Conduct.

The Commission is a constitutional public body that investigates and, after hearings, makes findings and recommends disposition of judicial disciplinary cases.1 See *285Ariz. Const, art. 6.1; In re Haddad, 128 Ariz. 490, 491-92, 627 P.2d 221, 222-23 (1981). This court then independently reviews the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of MarquardtArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Matter of HaddadArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Crouch v. Justice of the Peace Court of the Sixth PrecinctCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Matter of HeuermannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Matter of AckelArizona Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Alred v. Commonwealth, Judicial Conduct CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Matter of GoodfarbArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re JettArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re LoronaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re RoseTexas Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API