Legal Opinion

Matter of Goodfarb

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1994No. JC-94-0002. Comm. on Judicial Conduct 93-CJC-200, 93-CJC-210PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*401OPINION

MARTONE, Justice.

This is a judicial disciplinary proceeding in which the respondent, Stanley Z. Goodfarb, Judge of the Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County, asks us to modify the sanction recommended by the Commission on Judicial Conduct under Rule 11, Rules of Procedure for the Commission on Judicial Conduct.

I. BACKGROUND

Judge Goodfarb was charged with two counts of judicial misconduct. Count I alleged that in the case of State v. Joseph, 1 CA-CR 92-1379-PR, the Arizona Court of Appeals filed a memorandum decision in which it found that Judge Goodfarb had used the words…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matter of MarquardtArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Matter of PeckArizona Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Villafuerte v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Villafuerte v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. In Re JettArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re Honorable LamdinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Matter of FleischmanArizona Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API