Legal Opinion
Matter of Heuermann
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1976No. File 11682PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT.
In 1972 the people of this state adopted Article V of the South Dakota Constitution, the Judicial Article. Section 9 of that Article provides that the legislature should create a judicial qualifications commission. The section states:
“On recommendation of the judicial qualifications commission the Supreme Court, after hearing, may censure, remove or retire a justice or judge for action which constitutes willful misconduct in office, willful and persistent failure to perform his duties, habitual intemperance, disability that seriously interferes with the performance of the duties…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- In Re HansonAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Matter of CoruzziSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- In Re PauleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.