Legal Opinion
Matter of Marquardt
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1989No. JQ-88-0002PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
In this judicial misconduct case, we review the report of the Commission on Judicial Qualifications (Commission). See generally Rule 15, Rules of Procedure for the Commission on Judicial Qualifications, 17B A.R.S. (1988). We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6.1, §§ 2, 3, and 4.
By constitutional amendment adopted at the 1988 general election, the Commission is now known as the Commission on Judicial Conduct. Id., § 1. At all times during the Commission’s existence, its general purpose was to investigate, hold hearings, make findings, and recommend to this…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Walter David TallmadgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. VagnozziArizona Supreme Court · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Warren Wesley Summerlin v. Terry L. Stewart, Director of Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Zinger v. TerrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Summerlin v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Mann v. PierceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- KHOURNBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.