Legal Opinion

Matter of Haddad

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1981No. JUD-4PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

The Arizona Commission on Judicial Qualifications found that the respondent, Kelly Haddad, Justice of the Peace, Pinal County, Arizona, violated Canons One, Two and Three of the Code of Judicial Conduct, Rule 45, Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S., and Article 6.1, § 4 of the Constitution of the State of Arizona, and censure was recommended. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article 6.1 of the Arizona Constitution and Rule 11 of the Rules of Procedure for the Commission on Judicial Qualifications, 17A A.R.S.

This is the first time we have been called to write upon findings…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. McCartney v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Re MatteraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re AndersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re ThomaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re PauleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API