In Re Jett
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORCORAN, Justice.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The Commission on Judicial Conduct (Commission) found that Respondent, Rita Jett, a Tucson city magistrate, violated Canons 1, 2(A), 2(B), and 3(E) of the Code of Judicial Conduct; rule 81, Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court; and Ariz. Const. Art. 6.1, § 4. Accordingly, the Commission recommends that this court publicly censure and suspend Respondent, without pay, for a period of 60 days. The Commission also recommends that we require Respondent to continue her counseling program until her psychologist determines that counseling is no longer…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- McCartney v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Mississippi Com'n on Judicial Performance v. MillingMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Weiss v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- In re HalversonNevada Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.