Legal Opinion

In Re Jett

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1994No. JC-94-0001PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The Commission on Judicial Conduct (Commission) found that Respondent, Rita Jett, a Tucson city magistrate, violated Canons 1, 2(A), 2(B), and 3(E) of the Code of Judicial Conduct; rule 81, Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court; and Ariz. Const. Art. 6.1, § 4. Accordingly, the Commission recommends that this court publicly censure and suspend Respondent, without pay, for a period of 60 days. The Commission also recommends that we require Respondent to continue her counseling program until her psychologist determines that counseling is no longer…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. McCartney v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mississippi Com'n on Judicial Performance v. MillingMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Weiss v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. In re HalversonNevada Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API