Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Gateway Stables

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1951No. Civ. 18309PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Respondent recovered judgment against appellant, Llewellyn Phillips, Jr., for his negligence in assigning to, and allowing her to ride, Roxan, knowing (1) the beast to be a blooded and spirited mare and (2) respondent to be an inexperienced rider. She had sued appellant’s father who operated the Gateway Stables and his uncle, the animal’s owner, but they were both exculpated by the decision. While not disputing the. propriety of the amount of the award, appellant demands a reversal on the grounds that (1) neither the findings nor the conclusions justify the judgment and (2) the evidence does…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kersten v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Baugh v. BeattyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Finney v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Whalen v. StreshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Haneman v. Western Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Guido v. KoopmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Mungo v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Hagen v. LaursenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Hale v. O'NEILLAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API