Legal Opinion

Finney v. Curtis

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1889No. 12207PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

Action for damages for personal injuries done the plaintiff by defendant’s horse. Trial by jury, verdict for plaintiff for three thousand five hundred dollars, judgment accordingly, motion for new trial overruled, defendant appeals. The gist of the complaint is, that the defendant, knowing his horse to be vicious, induced the plaintiff to assist him in an attempt to hitch the horse to a wagon, by falsely stating to him that the horse was gentle; that plaintiff did attempt to assist him, whereupon the horse became unmanageable, knocked the plaintiff down and trampled upon him, breaking his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kennedy v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Barr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Clowdis v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Barnett v. La Mesa Post No. 282California Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API