Legal Opinion

Mungo v. Bennett

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 7, 1961No. 17763PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steve C. Griffith, Acting Justice.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff when kicked by a stallion belonging to the defendant. In a trial by jury the plaintiff was awarded actual damages in the amount of $7,500.00. The defendant appealed.

The complaint charged the appellant with negligence in (1) keeping a horse of known vicious nature, (2) in failing to warn respondent of its vicious nature, and (3) in failing to keep the horse under control.

Appellant excepts to the Trial Judge’s refusal to direct a verdict, or to order judgment notwithstanding the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. FORDSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  2. Thatcher v. DarrWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Boatman v. MilesWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Daniel v. Tower Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  5. Tolin v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Farrior v. PaytonHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Singleton v. ShererCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Cox v. HayesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Humphries v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Tamburello v. JaegerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API