Legal Opinion

Hale v. O'NEILL

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1971No. 1358PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This action stems from an equestrian mishap involving a spirited gelding named “Pepper”.

Plaintiff Donald Hale, a relative of the defendants, was a frequent visitor at the O’Neill home and had ridden Pepper at least six times. Hale grew up on a farm where he had some experience riding horses.

On July 4, 1969, at the O’Neills’ home, Hale saddled and mounted Pepper without any trouble. He rode Pepper into a neighbor’s field, where several other horses were standing about. Pepper bucked a few times upon seeing the other horses, then settled down. Hale then rode Pepper around…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bachner v. PearsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Leavitt v. GillaspieAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Wilson v. PolletAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hosmer v. . CarneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Patterson v. CushmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Joseph v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Vigue v. NoyesArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hiibschman Ex Rel. Welch v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API