Hale v. O'NEILL
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
This action stems from an equestrian mishap involving a spirited gelding named “Pepper”.
Plaintiff Donald Hale, a relative of the defendants, was a frequent visitor at the O’Neill home and had ridden Pepper at least six times. Hale grew up on a farm where he had some experience riding horses.
On July 4, 1969, at the O’Neills’ home, Hale saddled and mounted Pepper without any trouble. He rode Pepper into a neighbor’s field, where several other horses were standing about. Pepper bucked a few times upon seeing the other horses, then settled down. Hale then rode Pepper around…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bachner v. PearsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Leavitt v. GillaspieAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Wilson v. PolletAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Hosmer v. . CarneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Patterson v. CushmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Joseph v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Vigue v. NoyesArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Hiibschman Ex Rel. Welch v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.