Legal Opinion

Guido v. Koopman

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1991No. A052006PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Diana L. Guido and Donald Schwartz, a married couple, appeal from a summary judgment, enforcing a release from all liability, in favor of defendant and respondent Charles Koopman, doing business as The Academy of Equestrian Arts (the Academy). Appellants contend the release is unenforceable because it was executed in reliance on respondent’s misrepresentation that it was unenforceable. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

Guido filed her complaint against three groups of defendants for personal injuries allegedly resulting from three…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Madison v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Hoffman v. 162 North Wolfe CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Broberg v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API