Legal Opinion

Haneman v. Western Meat Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1908No. Civ. No. 326PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. M. H. Hyland, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries received by plaintiff from being kicked by a horse owned by defendant while plaintiff was in its employ and driving the horse in connection with such employment. A verdict was rendered for plaintiff, on which judgment was entered. This appeal is from the judgment and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

It is alleged that at the time of the injury plaintiff was employed, and for several months prior thereto had been employed, by the defendant to work in and about its meat market in the city of San Jose and vicinity, and…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barnett v. La Mesa Post No. 282California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Boatman v. MilesWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  3. O'Brien v. Gateway StablesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Barrett v. Metropolitan Contracting Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Rector v. Southern Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API