Legal Opinion

Kersten v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1942No. Civ. 13101PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

P1aintiff instituted this aeti&n to recover darnages for personal injuries sustained by him as the result of being thrown from a horse hired from defendant corporation, which owned and operated a riding academy and stables. The complaint contained two causes of action, the first of which alleged negligent hiring of the horse by defendant to plaintiff, while the second charged a breach of warranty of suitability of the horse hired by plaintiff from defendant.

By his complaint plaintiff alleged that he was an unskilled rider, incapable of riding any horse other than a gentle and dependable one.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Dam v. Lake Aliso Riding SchoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Wolfsen v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Wilmot v. Golden Gate Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. McNeal v. GreenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Minniear v. TorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API