Williams v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment on the pleadings which was rendered against them. The complaint is couched in two counts. The first cause of action is a simple suit to quiet title to several tracts of land in Tuolumne County owned and possessed by the respective plaintiffs. The second cause of action alleges that these tracts of land border on the Tuolumne River from which for many years the plaintiffs have appropriated and used the waters to irrigate their respective tracts and for domestic purposes, which water rights thus acquired they also seek to have quieted; that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- City of Los Angeles v. AitkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. International Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Beckley v. Reclamation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Fortaleza v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.