Legal Opinion
Livermore v. Beal
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 15, 1937No. Civ. 5762; Civ. 5763; Civ. 5764; Civ. 5765PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The foregoing entitled cases, four in number, involving the same questions, are presented to us for consideration upon this appeal. In the court below a demurrer, general and special, was sustained to the amended complaint in every one of the actions named, leave to amend being-denied. The several amended complaints set forth causes in the nature of actions to quiet title.
In the complaint filed by W. B. Livermore it is alleged that the plaintiff, long prior to the beginning of the action was, and now is the owner of an undivided one-eighth portion of the northeast quarter of section 34,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Varcoe v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Louisiana v. GarfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Hammell v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- EH Morrill Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.