Legal Opinion
Fortaleza v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 27, 2009No. C 09-2004 PJHPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND VACATING HEARING DATE
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
Before the court is a motion to dismiss and a motion to strike filed by defendants PNC Financial Services Group., Inc. (“PNC”) and National City Bank (“National City”). Plaintiff Alicia Fortaleza did not oppose the motion. Nor did plaintiff file a statement of non-opposition pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3. Because the court finds that oral argument is unnecessary and would not be helpful, the hearing date of July 29, 2009 is VACATED pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1 (b). For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Langan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Castaneda v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Medrano v. Kern County Sheriff's OfficerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Lucia v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Keen v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.