Beckley v. Reclamation Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
These areappeals, in four consolidated inverse condemnation actions, from judgments of dismissal following the sustaining of demurrers without leave to amend.
A whole generation has grown up since the origin of this controversy, initiated by the filing of claims by the four landowners with respondent board and the Board of Control in 1944. These claims were not acted on for three years. Then they were denied and in 1947 original complaints were filed. Amended complaints were filed in September 1952. (Unexplained is the inertia between 1947 and 1952.) Respondents demurred and the demurrers were…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District Ex Rel. State Reclamation Board v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Weiner v. Mitchell, Silberberg & KnuppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.