Legal Opinion

Miller v. McLaglen

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1947No. Civ. 15835PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLEE, J. pro tem.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendant rendered upon the sustaining of an objection by defendant to the introduction of any evidence.

The complaint is in two counts: the first, a common count for money alleged to have been received by the defendant for the use of plaintiff; the second, a common count for money on account of goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. The answer to the first count admits the receipt of the money by defendant and denies the other allegations. The answer to the second count is a general denial. Defendant then pleads as a…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Wagner v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API