Legal Opinion
Peabody v. City of Vallejo
California Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1935No. Sac. 4526PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment permanently enjoining the defendant, City of Vallejo, as an appropriator, from storing any of the waters of Gordon Valley Creek. The operation of the injunction was stayed upon certain conditions pending a determination of the appeal.
Gordon Valley Creek and Wooden Valley Creek have their sources in separate watersheds in Napa County and flow southerly to their junction in the southern portion of said county. Prom this point of confluence the stream is known as Suisun Creek, which flows southerly through Suisun Valley in Solano County and empties into the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Connecticut v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.