Legal Opinion

South Shore Land Co. v. Petersen

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1964No. Civ. 20709PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

On this appeal by defendant and cross-complainant, Elinor E. Petersen, hereinafter referred to as appellant, from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and cross-defendant, South Shore Land Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent, upon the sustaining of a demurrer to appellant’s second amended answer and cross-complaint without leave to amend, the sole question is whether said answer states facts sufficient to constitute a defense and whether said cross-complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The Proceedings

Respondent filed a complaint to…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Hilltop Properties, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Hughes v. Blue Cross of Northern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API