Tungsten Holdings, Inc. v. Kimberlin

¶ 1 Appellants Lena Kamberlin et al. (hereafter, the Kimberlins), appeal the judgment upon remittitur of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County.

¶2 We affirm.

¶3 We restate the issues as follows:

¶4 1. Whether the District Court erred in determining that the easement has a two-lane width.

¶5 2. Whether the District Court erred in failing to limit Tungsten’s use of the road to agricultural and recreational uses.

¶6 3. Whether the District Court erred in failing to explicitly limit Tungsten’s easement to the portion of the historical road that lies on the Kimberlins’ property.

¶7 4.…