Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. Department of Natural Resources

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2003No. Docket 233143PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Matthew J. Schumacher appeals and defendant Department of Natural Resources cross-appeals a trial-court order granting plaintiff an easement by necessity over state land, but limiting it to nonmotorized transportation. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for a determination regarding the proper scope of the easement.

In 1896, the state acquired a square, nine-parcel block of land located in Midland County. The state also acquired a tenth parcel that was immediately south of the parcel in the southwest comer of the block. The other adjacent parcels immediately to the south…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nation v. W D E Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Schadewald v. BruleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Armstrong v. Ypsilanti Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Burt Township v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sides v. ClelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schumacher v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Davis v. State Employees' Retirement BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Matthews v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Ashby v. MAECHLINGMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Palmer v. R. A. Yancey Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API