Legal Opinion

Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. Desaye

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1991No. 90-628PublishedCited by 316 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

This is an appeal from a judgment of possession of the Twelfth Judicial District, Chouteau County. Subsequent to a foreclosure action, the District Court found that the appellants, Joe and Grace DeSaye (DeSaye), were not entitled to possession of their farm in Loma, Montana, during the statutory redemption period. We affirm.

A question in this case involves the District Court’s denial of a motion in limine during the foreclosure proceeding. DeSaye was precluded from introducing expert testimony regarding the interest rates charged by respondent, Interstate Production Credit Association of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. W.R.B. Corp. v. GeerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Western Cottonoil Company v. J. C. Hodges and Mary WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Wallace v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. SniderMontana Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by316 opinions

  1. Daines v. KnightMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Goodover v. Lindey's Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. BowerMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In re J.N.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. FlackMontana Supreme Court · 1993

311 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API